The platform behind every engagement
CybeRapid
your security, in one place.
CybeRapid is the application security platform we built for ourselves and then opened to our clients. It carries an engagement from scope to verified fix — every finding, its evidence, its remediation and its retest — so the answer to “where are we?” is a page, not a meeting.
What has run through it
Five years of engagements, in one system
Not a launch. The platform has carried our own delivery since 2021, and every figure on this page is drawn from its records rather than from a marketing estimate.
- 6,643Findings managed
- 890Projects
- 167Customers
- 276Named test cases
Findings recorded on the platform between October 2021 and August 2026, across 890 projects for 167 customers. Earlier work predates the platform and is not counted, so every number here is a floor rather than a lifetime total. 83.3% of findings carry a template or CWE, which is the subset any breakdown by type describes.
What it is
Three things it does that a report cannot
A penetration test produces knowledge. Most of it decays in a PDF. CybeRapid exists so it does not.
Complete visibility
Every finding across every project in one place, from discovery through to verified fix. Nothing sits in a spreadsheet, and nothing quietly falls off the list between an assessment and the retest.
A closed loop, not a PDF
A finding is not closed because someone says it is. It is closed when we have retested it against your fixed build and confirmed it. The platform tracks that state, so what you see is what is actually true.
Built for people, not instead of them
CybeRapid takes the mechanical part of an engagement off our testers — the repetition, the collation, the chasing. What it does not do is decide what matters. That stays a judgement, made by the person doing the work.
And three it will not do
The limits are the product
Every platform in this category claims to find more. These are the three places ours deliberately does less — each one with the number underneath it.
It will not decide what matters
Automation proposes; a person disposes. Every candidate is reviewed by the engineer who signs the report, and anything that is not genuinely exploitable in your system is discarded before you ever see it. We would rather tell you a finding does not matter than pad a report with it.
It will not inflate a severity
Severities move down here far more often than up. Across findings still open, 114 have been lowered and 3 raised — roughly 38 to 1, measured rather than asserted. A rating you cannot trust is worse than no rating.
It will not close a finding on trust
We have retested 1,237 fixes. Only 42% were right first time, and 26.5% of the verdicts were not a clean fix at all — the change addressed the symptom and left the cause. That gap is exactly why closure requires a retest and not an email.
How it works
Scope, test, report, verify
The same four steps every engagement runs, with the platform holding the state between them.
Scope and plan
Agree the scope.
Test and discover
Test, and publish as we go.
Report and prioritise
Order by real impact.
Fix and verify
Retest until it is closed.
Scope and plan
We agree what is in scope and what matters most, and the platform turns that into the test plan the engagement actually runs against.
Test and discover
Our researchers work through the application. Findings land in the platform as they are confirmed — you see critical issues the day we find them, not at the end.
Report and prioritise
Each finding carries reproduction steps, real business impact and a concrete remediation, ordered by what an attacker can actually achieve in your system.
Fix and verify
Your developers fix; we retest every finding and mark it closed only when it is. The retest is part of the engagement, not an upsell.
The last step is the one most engagements never really finish. Ours runs at a median of 0.2 days from the moment you tell us a fix is in — against a median 33 days for a fix to arrive. The delay has never been on our side, and that is checkable in your own history.
What you get
Why clients ask for the platform by name
One dashboard, every project
Live status across engagements, environments and teams — instead of a folder of dated PDFs nobody can diff.
Findings your developers can act on
Written for the engineer who has to fix it: what it is, how to reproduce it, what it actually costs you, and what a correct fix looks like.
Verified closure
Every reported finding retested against the fixed build — and in 26.5% of the verdicts we have recorded, the first fix did not hold. That is the whole argument for the loop.
Evidence for the people who ask
Customer security reviews, regulators and certification bodies all want the same thing: proof. Export it rather than reassemble it each time.
Coverage that keeps up
Web, API, mobile, cloud, SaaS and AI-enabled systems — including the failure modes that only appeared once applications started embedding language models.
The same people throughout
The platform is ours, so the engineers testing your system built the tooling they use. You are not handed to a junior after the kick-off call.
Why it makes the testing better
It buys our testers their time back
The honest reason we built it: an engagement contains a lot of work that is real but mechanical — setting up, collating, re-running the same checks, chasing which finding is fixed. None of it is where the value is.
CybeRapid absorbs that, so more of a fixed number of days goes on the part that needs judgement: following a workflow to its edge, chaining two harmless issues into one that is not, working out what your application is actually supposed to allow.
That is why the platform is not sold as a scanner subscription. It is the reason the report you get is deeper for the same budget — and our published catalogue of 276 test cases is what it runs the engagement against.
- Tools as acceleratorsAutomation and AI take the repetition; judgement stays human.
- Nothing marked fixed on trustClosure requires a retest that passed.
- Your data stays yoursFindings are a map of how to attack you. They are treated that way, under NDA as standard.
- Built by the testersThe people who use it are the people who wrote it.
Go deeper
The two questions everybody asks next
Inside a test
What the platform does, what the engineer does, and the evidence trail behind every finding. The page to send to whoever will ask how this actually works.
Read moreYour workspace
What you see while the engagement runs: live findings, the evidence behind each one, retest state — and why the portal is read-only by design.
Read moreAlready a client?
Sign in to the CybeRapid portal
Your findings, their current state, the evidence behind each one and the retest status — live. Access is through your organisation’s single sign-on; we never hold a separate password for you.
Not a client yet? A walkthrough is the fastest way to see whether this fits how your team already works — we will show you a real engagement structure rather than a slide deck.
Tell us what the system does and what worries you.
Every engagement runs on CybeRapid. Scoping costs you a conversation, not a commitment.